http://www.quicklz.com/Originally Posted by Lasse Reinhold
http://www.quicklz.com/Originally Posted by Lasse Reinhold
QuickLZ tested here. http://cs.fit.edu/~mmahoney/compression/text.html# 4106
Compression with -3 is a bit worse than quick3 1.30 beta. Also, curious that -0 compresses better but slower than -1.
Hi Matt,
Thanks for testing
It's level 0 which is using the new algorithm (wrote a little about it at the bottom of http://www.c10n.info/archives/461) and level 1, 2 and 3 which are compatible with 1.20. Please fix it on your website
Level 0 is almost always faster than 1 with the -mem flag, so it must be disk I/O disturbance.
Level 0 compresses faster on my Sempron 2400+ machine...
ENWIK8 (Level 0)
Compression Time: 2.485 Seconds
Compressed Size: 52,803,919 bytes
ENWIK8 (Level 1)
Compression Time: 3.282 Seconds
Compressed Size: 57,153,015 bytes