
Originally Posted by
LovePimple
All of my own tests have shown it to be slower. I will include it with future releases if anyone reports it to be faster on their machines.

Here are some tests for PAQ8pf (both Beta1 and 2) on TestBed.tar
Code:
version\option enc.time size memory
----------------------------------------------------------
paq8px_sp_opt_64 -6 1094.850 5 492 622 450 MiB
paq8pf_b1 -6 259.379 6 573 733 361 MiB
paq8pf_alt_b1 -6 253.396 6 573 733 314 MiB
paq8pf_b2 -6 265.101 6 473 251 378 MiB
paq8px_sp_opt_64 -1 262.572 5 918 448 49 MiB
paq8pf_b1 -1 238.960 6 732 971 50 MiB
paq8pf_alt_b1 -1 232.813 6 732 971 50 MiB
paq8pf_b2 -1 244.477 6 662 383 51 MiB
I've also notice a small issue with memory requirements reported by PAQs. For example PAQ8px_64 at -6 level reports that 527 716 716 bytes (503 MiB) have been used but according to Process Explorer's Peak Working Set only 450 MiB utilised. Same for -1 level. Reported was 51.5 MiB and actual was 49 MiB.