Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Test set: bookstar

  1. 21st November 2008, 17:36 #1
    m^2
    m^2 is offline
    Member m^2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Ślůnsk, PL
    Posts
    1,610
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 65 Times in 47 Posts

    Test set: bookstar

    Data: Shelwein's bookstar, a collection of russian sci-fi books in plain text.
    150 files, 35476404 B.
    The best:
    Code:
    Archiver           Size        Time
XCOPY              35476404    0.406
quick -0           21921597    0.500
LZTurbo -11        19489232    0.609
LZTurbo -21        18356879    0.687
4x4 2              18223535    0.718
LZTurbo -31        17237227    0.750
4x4 3              16325839    0.875
LZTurbo -41        15265719    1.015
slug               14320218    1.468
4x4 5              13848424    2.469
LZTurbo -43        13698376    2.500
LZTurbo -53        13582494    3.078
LZTurbo -44        13282683    4.000
LZTurbo -54        13181826    4.594
LZTurbo -45        12932881    5.297
sr2                12720681    5.390
rings 5            10385280    5.547
rings 6            10277680    5.641
rings 7            10203331    5.750
rings 8            10152862    5.812
rings 9            10152862    5.812
FreeArc 3dict+rings 9702855    8.890
FreeArc 9dict+rings 9611473    8.891
4x4 4t              9565158   12.406
FreeArc -m4         9372917   30.484
FreeArc -m5         9313812   32.375
FreeArc -m6         9117631   33.641
FreeArc -m7         9050728   34.828
FreeArc -m8         9050726   35.203
CMM4 66             8788409   81.250
LPAQ2 5             8762106  124.500
LPAQ2 6             8693953  132.704
LPAQ9k 4            8598404  133.984
LPAQ9k 5            8488879  138.344
LPAQ9k 6            8432443  142.031
LPAQ9k 7            8406195  144.297
    Interesting things:
    -All archivers were slow, none got even 70 MB/s and none managed to beat XCOPY.
    -Nanozip performed poorly.
    -LZTurbo *9 modes were faster than *8
    https://extrememoderate.wordpress.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 23rd November 2008, 14:46 #2
    IsName
    IsName is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    115
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by m^2 View Post
    Data: Shelwein's bookstar, a collection of russian sci-fi books in plain text.
    -All archivers were slow, none got even 70 MB/s and none managed to beat XCOPY.
    -Nanozip performed poorly.
    -LZTurbo *9 modes were faster than *8
    Nanozip's poor performance is expectable: author tuned it to English text. That's why I'm not interested in it. And its fast compression modes are Just Crap: lzp, replaced by tor in FA 0.4 already..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 23rd November 2008, 20:26 #3
    Bulat Ziganshin
    Bulat Ziganshin is offline
    Programmer Bulat Ziganshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Uzbekistan
    Posts
    4,593
    Thanks
    801
    Thanked 698 Times in 378 Posts
    fa used lzp *preprocessor* with byte-aligned coding which has not much common with full-featured lzp compressors. it was just a temporary solution
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 24th November 2008, 01:59 #4
    m^2
    m^2 is offline
    Member m^2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Ślůnsk, PL
    Posts
    1,610
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 65 Times in 47 Posts
    Update:
    BIT 0.7
    7zip Defalte / BZIP
    cabarc
    LZC
    UHARC
    SQX
    More CMM modes

    The only change to the list is that the single CMM entry expanded to several that differ slightly.

    Code:
    Archiver           Size        Time
XCOPY              35476404    0.406
quick -0           21921597    0.500
LZTurbo -11        19489232    0.609
LZTurbo -21        18356879    0.687
4x4 2              18223535    0.718
LZTurbo -31        17237227    0.750
4x4 3              16325839    0.875
LZTurbo -41        15265719    1.015
slug               14320218    1.468
4x4 5              13848424    2.469
LZTurbo -43        13698376    2.500
LZTurbo -53        13582494    3.078
LZTurbo -44        13282683    4.000
LZTurbo -54        13181826    4.594
LZTurbo -45        12932881    5.297
sr2                12720681    5.390
rings 5            10385280    5.547
rings 6            10277680    5.641
rings 7            10203331    5.750
rings 8            10152862    5.812
rings 9            10152862    5.812
FreeArc 3dict+rings 9702855    8.890
FreeArc 9dict+rings 9611473    8.891
4x4 4t              9565158   12.406
FreeArc -m4         9372917   30.484
FreeArc -m5         9313812   32.375
FreeArc -m6         9117631   33.641
FreeArc -m7         9050728   34.828
FreeArc -m8         9050726   35.203
CMM4 13             8931853   72.844
CMM4 53             8907969   72.859
CMM4 63             8907968   73.000
CMM4 14             8856372   74.672
CMM4 24             8849413   74.719
CMM4 44             8830950   74.813
CMM4 54             8829991   74.891
CMM4 64             8829989   74.922
CMM4 15             8825822   77.485
CMM4 25             8818868   77.593
CMM4 35             8806104   77.735
CMM4 65             8799122   77.750
CMM4 36             8795803   80.688
CMM4 46             8790018   80.796
CMM4 56             8788409   80.843
LPAQ2 5             8762106  124.500
LPAQ2 6             8693953  132.704
LPAQ9k 4            8598404  133.984
LPAQ9k 5            8488879  138.344
LPAQ9k 6            8432443  142.031
LPAQ9k 7            8406195  144.297
    Interesting things:
    -All archivers were slow, none got even 70 MB/s and none managed to beat XCOPY.
    -Nanozip performed poorly.
    -LZTurbo *9 modes were faster than *8[/QUOTE]
    Attached Files Attached Files
    https://extrememoderate.wordpress.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 20th January 2009, 19:04 #5
    m^2
    m^2 is offline
    Member m^2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Ślůnsk, PL
    Posts
    1,610
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 65 Times in 47 Posts
    Large update.
    PPMX 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5
    FreeArc -m*xx
    FreeArc 0.5a 2009.01.05
    7z 4.62
    PPMd (enters "the best" list)
    PPMVC
    DZIP
    DURILCA (enters "the best" list)
    LZO
    Fpaq0pv5
    HOOK
    Added a new efficiency measure, by Bulat Ziganshin, slightly tweaked by me.
    mcomp
    Slim
    Packet
    Slug X
    The best:
    Code:
    XCOPY                       35476404   0.406
quick -0                    21921597   0.500
LZTurbo -11                 19489232   0.609
LZTurbo -21                 18356879   0.687
4x4  2                      18223535   0.718
LZTurbo -31                 17237227   0.750
4x4  3                      16325839   0.875
LZTurbo -41                 15265719   1.015
slug                        14320218   1.468
slug X                      13881376   1.640
4x4  5                      13848424   2.469
LZTurbo -43                 13698376   2.500
LZTurbo -53                 13582494   3.078
LZTurbo -44                 13282683   4.000
LZTurbo -54                 13181826   4.594
LZTurbo -45                 12932881   5.297
sr2                         12720681   5.390
rings 5                     10385280   5.547
rings 6                     10277680   5.641
rings 7                     10203331   5.750
rings 8                     10152862   5.812
rings 9                     10152862   5.812
PPMdI o 4 r1 256MB          10139314   8.422
PPMdJ o 4 r1 256MB          10123758   8.750
FreeArc 3dict+rings          9702855   8.890
FreeArc 9dict+rings          9611473   8.891
4x4 4t                       9565158  12.406
PPMdI o 8 256MB              9276604  23.188
PPMdJ o 8 256MB              9273198  23.813
PPMdI o12 256MB              9261228  26.625
PPMdJ o12 256MB              9259062  27.187
DURILCA'light   o8   800MB   9120713  27.500
DURILCA'light   o9   800MB   9090579  29.922
FreeArc -m7                  9050728  34.766
FreeArc -m9                  9050727  35.062
FreeArc -m8                  9050726  35.063
PPMonstrH o12 256MB          9049555  59.204
PPMonstrH o16 256MB          9022479  60.688
CMM4 13                      8931853  72.844
CMM4 53                      8907969  72.859
CMM4 63                      8907968  73.000
CMM4 14                      8856372  74.672
CMM4 24                      8849413  74.719
CMM4 44                      8830950  74.813
CMM4 54                      8829991  74.891
CMM4 64                      8829989  74.922
CMM4 15                      8825822  77.485
CMM4 25                      8818868  77.593
CMM4 35                      8806104  77.735
CMM4 65                      8799122  77.750
CMM4 36                      8795803  80.688
CMM4 46                      8790018  80.796
CMM4 56                      8788409  80.843
PPMonstrI o12 800MB          8665753 100.047
PPMonstrI o16 r0 800MB       8635038 102.422
PPMonstrI o32 800MB          8618447 126.000
LPAQ9k 4                     8598404 133.984
LPAQ9k 5                     8488879 138.344
LPAQ9k 6                     8432443 142.031
LPAQ9k 7                     8406195 144.297
    Attached Files Attached Files
    https://extrememoderate.wordpress.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 11th February 2009, 17:49 #6
    m^2
    m^2 is offline
    Member m^2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Ślůnsk, PL
    Posts
    1,610
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 65 Times in 47 Posts
    Update:
    Code:
    SCOTTZ
BICOM
m99
rar
m03
BCM 0.02, 0.03
Bee
Srank
szip (the best, sr2 is out)
ocamyd
TarsaLZP
BBB
BMA
LZPXj
Dark with 160m block
YBS
OpenDark (the best)
Blizzard 140000000 (the best, ruled out some PPMD modes)
LPAQ9l (the best)
    The best:
    Code:
    quick -0               21921597   0.500
LZTurbo -11            19489232   0.609
LZTurbo -21            18356879   0.687
4x4  2                 18223535   0.718
LZTurbo -31            17237227   0.750
4x4  3                 16325839   0.875
LZTurbo -41            15265719   1.015
slug                   14320218   1.468
slug X                 13881376   1.640
4x4  5                 13848424   2.469
LZTurbo -43            13698376   2.500
LZTurbo -53            13582494   3.078
LZTurbo -44            13282683   4.000
LZTurbo -54            13181826   4.594
LZTurbo -45            12932881   5.297
szip b17 o  4          11268909   5.359
szip b41 o  4          10959375   5.421
rings 5                10385280   5.547
rings 6                10277680   5.641
rings 7                10203331   5.750
rings 9                10152862   5.812
rings 8                10152862   5.812
PPMdI o 4 r1 256MB     10139314   8.422
PPMdJ o 4 r1 256MB     10123758   8.750
FreeArc 3dict+rings     9702855   8.890
FreeArc 9dict+rings     9611473   8.891
4x4 4t                  9565158  12.406
OpenDark 160m           9458218  18.625
Blizzard f 140000000    9257193  22.187
Blizzard c 140000000    9107041  25.641
DURILCA'light o9 800MB  9090579  29.922
FreeArc -m7             9050728  34.766
FreeArc -m9             9050727  35.062
FreeArc -m8             9050726  35.063
PPMonstrH o12 256MB     9049555  59.204
PPMonstrH o16 256MB     9022479  60.688
CMM4 13                 8931853  72.844
CMM4 53                 8907969  72.859
CMM4 63                 8907968  73.000
CMM4 14                 8856372  74.672
CMM4 24                 8849413  74.719
CMM4 44                 8830950  74.813
CMM4 54                 8829991  74.891
CMM4 64                 8829989  74.922
CMM4 15                 8825822  77.485
CMM4 25                 8818868  77.593
CMM4 35                 8806104  77.735
CMM4 65                 8799122  77.750
CMM4 36                 8795803  80.688
CMM4 46                 8790018  80.796
CMM4 56                 8788409  80.843
PPMonstrI o12 800MB     8665753 100.047
PPMonstrI o16 r0 800MB  8635038 102.422
PPMonstrI o32 800MB     8618447 126.000
LPAQ9k 4                8598404 133.984
LPAQ9l 4                8596933 134.844
LPAQ9k 5                8488879 138.344
LPAQ9k 6                8432443 142.031
LPAQ9k 7                8406195 144.297
    Attached Files Attached Files
    https://extrememoderate.wordpress.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. An interesting test set
    By nanoflooder in forum Data Compression
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 13th April 2009, 02:33
  2. Test set: installer
    By m^2 in forum Data Compression
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11th February 2009, 14:47
  3. Test set: bitmap
    By m^2 in forum Data Compression
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 13th January 2009, 17:44
  4. Test set: music
    By m^2 in forum Data Compression
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10th December 2008, 00:25
  5. Test set: backup
    By m^2 in forum Data Compression
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23rd October 2008, 23:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules