
Originally Posted by
maadjordan
on the other hand about the packjpg v2.4wip it seemss fine with color jpg but when using grayscale images it losses compression compared to v2.3..
is there a chance to test my finiding more.. as least a compiled version would fine..
I can only send Matthias Stirner a message and ask him when a compiled version will be out. He said that compression ratio would be better for most files, but he knew that there were some that would lose ratio. Anyway, this packJPG version is no final version, so I think we should wait for a final v2.4 release.

Originally Posted by
thometal
I would prefer an integretion into freearc, because I don't like to have 1 archiver per filetype. Also with freearc you have a good GUI and excellent algorithms. So why to research the wheel more than once?
Thats my opinion. And I think in this way your algorithm will be widely-used.
I'll think about this. There's a Precomp preset in arc.ini, but perhaps a deeper integration would be useful.
For SFX archives, however, I will have to do everything myself to get the smallest possible overhead.
I have experimented with some Motion JPG videos and there is a standard JPG DHT header that has to be inserted. Results are not that good, but this should be improvable, also JPGs in this video are rather small.
Only adding the DHT header without recompressing would also be an option to proceed with PAQ which will get a much better ratio.
WhatBox_180x120_411_q25.avi 10.540.140 Bytes
WhatBox_180x120_411_q25.pcf 9.973.896 Bytes (5,4% smaller)
WhatBox_180x120_411_q25.avi.ccm2 6.691.207 Bytes
WhatBox_180x120_411_q25.pcf.ccm2 6.532.180 Bytes (2,4% smaller)
Damn, now I have to release the next Precomp version earlier